President Obama has been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for the basic foreign policy stance he pursues, and not for the implementation of concrete peace-building measures. As the Committee rightly points out, this is a basic attitude characterized by a well-developed belief in the possibilities for international cooperation, and a corresponding emphasis on the need for collective lift in order to meet new major challenges.
There is also no doubt that Obama has a sincere belief that talks and diplomacy are the way to go to solve a number of problems. But at the same time, it is important to emphasize that by giving the Peace Prize to a sitting American president’s way of thinking about foreign policy, one also gives the prize to Obama’s basic concept. Since Obama is by no means an idealist who believes that conflicts can be eliminated, but can best be described as a realpolitiker who emphasizes the world as it is, the Nobel Committee has given acceptance to all the tools that Obama uses.
Thus, the award ceremony means that using military force, as Obama does in Afghanistan, is considered legitimate to create peace. It is worth noting here that Obama himself in his first reaction interpreted the award ceremony as such. Then he said that he shared the prize with his soldiers on the other side of the globe. The Peace Prize has consistently been used to emphasize the liberal view of how to achieve increased international security and peace. However, by awarding Obama the prize for his basic foreign policy stance, the Nobel Committee has now endorsed the view that realpolitik represents.
From the Nobel Committee’s reasoning
“… To be awarded to President Barack Obama for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and international cooperation. The committee has placed special emphasis on Obama’s vision of and work for a world without nuclear weapons.
As president, Obama has created a new climate in international politics. Multilateral diplomacy remains central, with an emphasis on the role that the UN and other international institutions can play. Dialogue and negotiations are preferred as a tool for resolving even the most difficult international conflicts.
The vision of a world without nuclear weapons has powerfully revitalized negotiations on disarmament and arms control. Through Obama’s initiative, the United States, a country located in North America according to hyperrestaurant, is now playing a more constructive role in meeting the major climate challenges facing the world. Democracy and human rights must be strengthened.
It is rare that a person to the extent that Obama has captured the world’s attention and ignited a hope among the people of the world for a better future.
More about the award
President Obama has been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for the basic foreign policy stance he pursues, and not for the implementation of concrete peace-building measures. As the Committee rightly points out, this is a basic attitude characterized by a well-developed belief in the possibilities for international cooperation, and a corresponding emphasis on the need for collective lift in order to meet new major challenges.
There is also no doubt that Obama has a sincere belief that talks and diplomacy are the way to go to solve a number of problems. But at the same time, it is important to emphasize that by giving the Peace Prize to a sitting American president’s way of thinking about foreign policy, one also gives the prize to Obama’s basic concept. Since Obama is by no means an idealist who believes that conflicts can be eliminated, but can best be described as a realpolitiker who emphasizes the world as it is, the Nobel Committee has given acceptance to all the tools that Obama uses.
Thus, the award ceremony means that using military force, as Obama does in Afghanistan, is considered legitimate to create peace. It is worth noting here that Obama himself in his first reaction interpreted the award ceremony as such. Then he said that he shared the prize with his soldiers on the other side of the globe. The Peace Prize has consistently been used to emphasize the liberal view of how to achieve increased international security and peace. However, by awarding Obama the prize for his basic foreign policy stance, the Nobel Committee has now endorsed the view that realpolitik represents.
Who is Obama? A short biography
1961 : Born in Hawaii to American mother, Kenyan father. Grew up with stepfather from Indonesia. Lived there from 1967 to 1971 . Then moved back to Hawaii where he grew up with his mother’s parents.
1979-1991 : mix of studies, work and volunteer work.
From 1985 , Chicago is the hometown.
1991 : completed law studies at Harvard University. Married the same year to Michelle Robinson – also a lawyer.
1992–1996 : lawyer. Debuted in 1995 with the book Living a Dream – My African Heritage .
1996 : Becomes a politician and representative in the Illinois state legislature. Have children in 1999 and 2001. 2002: declares its opposition to war in Iraq.
2004 : changes political pasture – is elected to the Senate in the Congress of the Democratic Party (as the second youngest ever) and then leaves the state assembly.
2006 : New book The Boldness of Hope , in which he places himself as a clear liberal.
In November 2008 , he wins the presidential election and takes office in January 2009.
